Re: Discussion: Macros for Python Specfiles

2013-05-26 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 05/25/2013 03:13 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As the Zen of python says, "Explicit is better than implicit." In this case the macros are moving us away from being explicit for only a little gain. (I'll acknowledge and talk about the gain in the next section). Moreover, for every command line th

Re: Discussion: Macros for Python Specfiles

2013-05-24 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 01:57:01PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 05/06/2013 10:43 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >Hi all, > >as mentioned in [1], I'd like to start a discussion about proposed Python > >macros. > >The full macro file can be seen at [2] and an example diff of converted spec > >at [

Re: Discussion: Macros for Python Specfiles

2013-05-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 05/06/2013 10:43 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: Hi all, as mentioned in [1], I'd like to start a discussion about proposed Python macros. The full macro file can be seen at [2] and an example diff of converted spec at [3]. The important macros from the proposal are: %py_default_filter # will f

Discussion: Macros for Python Specfiles

2013-05-06 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
Hi all, as mentioned in [1], I'd like to start a discussion about proposed Python macros. The full macro file can be seen at [2] and an example diff of converted spec at [3]. The important macros from the proposal are: %py_default_filter # will filter all *.so file provides from /usr/lib{64}/p