Re: Missing executables in Python 3 subpackages

2017-03-06 Thread Piotr Popieluch
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: > Hi all, > > According to the Fedora Packaging guidelines for Python [0], if a Python > package that supports Python 3 installs executables into */usr/bin*, then > either both Python versions of the executables should

Re: Missing executables in Python 3 subpackages

2017-03-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 06:06:49PM +0100, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: > python-igor This one is functional under python3, but the output is slightly nicer under python2 (python3 shows some spurious b'' prefixes). So it's on py2 on purpose. Zbyszek ___

Re: Missing executables in Python 3 subpackages

2017-03-02 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 2.3.2017 18:06, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: Hi all, According to the Fedora Packaging guidelines for Python [0], if a Python packagethat supports Python 3installs executables into //usr/bin/, then either both Python versions of the executables should be packaged, or only the Python 3 version,

Missing executables in Python 3 subpackages

2017-03-02 Thread Iryna Shcherbina
Hi all, According to the Fedora Packaging guidelines for Python [0], if a Python packagethat supports Python 3installs executables into //usr/bin/, then either both Python versions of the executables should be packaged, or only the Python 3 version, depending on the functionality they