Hi,
I saw many changes related to pyc last week, so I had a look. I don't
understand well these issues. Here are my notes to try to understand the
context ;-) I don't request any change, I'm fine with the latest choices
made in Fedora.
--
There are different issues:
(1) Performance regre
On 01. 02. 18 16:25, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 1 February 2018 at 23:54, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Honestly, I'm not sure we want to use this in Fedora. Is anyone here into
reproducible builds, to make a better argument for this?
I believe rpmbuild
On 02/01/2018 04:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 1 February 2018 at 23:54, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Honestly, I'm not sure we want to use this in Fedora. Is anyone here into
reproducible builds, to make a better argument for this?
I believe rpmbuild (et al) all set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in the
environm
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 1 February 2018 at 23:54, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm not sure we want to use this in Fedora. Is anyone here into
>> reproducible builds, to make a better argument for this?
>
> I believe rpmbuild (et al) all set SOURCE_DATE_EPOC
On 1 February 2018 at 23:54, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Honestly, I'm not sure we want to use this in Fedora. Is anyone here into
> reproducible builds, to make a better argument for this?
I believe rpmbuild (et al) all set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in the
environment, so Fedora's likely to get the new CHECK
Hello!
The first beta for Python 3.7 is out. It will hopefully get into Fedora
soon as python37.
After it comes out of beta, we'll upgrade python3 to it.
The What's New list is at: https://docs.python.org/3.7/whatsnew/3.7.html
One thing that's interesting for packagers is PEP 552: Deterministi
