Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-12-08 Thread Dhanesh B. Sabane
A friendly reminder that the on-boarding issue [1] isn't resolved yet. Please sponsor your sponsored members to *python-packagers-sig*. If all the members have been sponsored, I can request for editing the groups and switching pkgdb to use *python-packagers-sig* instead of python-sig.[2] [1]

Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-25 Thread Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane
> CommOps is currently working on the Python SIG On-Boarding ticket [1] and one > of the tasks > we have identified is re-writing the Python SIG wiki page to make it more > beginner-friendly. I was assigned with this particular task which is now > complete [2] [3]. > We received some feedback

Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-16 Thread Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane
> I was wondering whether it is a good time to make the new pages official. > Also, I would > like to know whether the idea of splitting the SIG into two FAS groups is > acceptable so > that we can start taking necessary actions. As instructed by jflory7, I've opened up a ticket on the

Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-14 Thread Charalampos Stratakis
8 PM Subject: Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue Aloha Python-SIG! I was wondering whether it is a good time to make the new pages official. Also, I would like to know whether the idea of splitting the SIG into two FAS groups is acceptable so that we can start taking necessary actions. > CommOps i

Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-13 Thread Tim Orling
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13.9.2016 19:27, Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane wrote: > >> Aloha Python-SIG! >> I was wondering whether it is a good time to make the new pages official. >> Also, I would like to know whether the idea of splitting the

Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13.9.2016 19:27, Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane wrote: Aloha Python-SIG! I was wondering whether it is a good time to make the new pages official. Also, I would like to know whether the idea of splitting the SIG into two FAS groups is acceptable so that we can start taking necessary actions.

Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-13 Thread Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane
Aloha Python-SIG! I was wondering whether it is a good time to make the new pages official. Also, I would like to know whether the idea of splitting the SIG into two FAS groups is acceptable so that we can start taking necessary actions. > CommOps is currently working on the Python SIG

Re: Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-07 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 7 September 2016 at 04:42, Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane wrote: > CommOps is currently working on the Python SIG On-Boarding ticket [1] and one > of the tasks we have identified is re-writing the Python SIG wiki page to > make it more beginner-friendly. I was

Python SIG on-boarding issue

2016-09-06 Thread Dhanesh Bhalchandra Sabane
CommOps is currently working on the Python SIG On-Boarding ticket [1] and one of the tasks we have identified is re-writing the Python SIG wiki page to make it more beginner-friendly. I was assigned with this particular task which is now complete [2] [3]. We received some feedback from