On 06/29/2017 04:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 12:11 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 29 June 2017 at 11:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 16:21 +0200, Iryna Shcherbina wrote:
2) Using `python-` instead of `python2-` in the dependencies for the
Python 2 binar
On 29 June 2017 at 11:39, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 16:21 +0200, Iryna Shcherbina wrote:
>> 2) Using `python-` instead of `python2-` in the dependencies for the
>> Python 2 binary RPM [2].
>
> I'm not sure this list is terribly useful, because of the above. There
> are thousan
Here are lists of packages that don't conform to the current Python
package naming policy, and their maintainers:
* Maintainers by Package [4]
* Packages by Maintainer [5]
The bad naming is blocking work to switch to Python 3. For more context,
see [0].
If you are on the list, please check i
> "IS" == Iryna Shcherbina writes:
IS> Thanks a lot, that is helpful. There is also a pkgdb2client [0]
IS> package that I've been looking into for this.
You could run that tool in a loop, parse the result and generate the
report, I guess, but it's also rather trivial to just make the necessa
To make this easy, I dug out an old script I had and cleaned it up.
It's 'find-package-maintainers' and is available from
https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities
Just feed it a list of source package names (on stdin or in a named
file) and it will extract the owner lists from pkgdb for
I'm actually revising the mass bug filing page at the moment.
- J<
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Iryna, could you draft a change?
Of course, working on it.
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 06/20/2017 05:54 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"IS" == Iryna Shcherbina writes:
IS> The packages that violate the above-mentioned policies are being
IS> tracked in portingdb [3] and we plan to start filling bugs soon.
Before doing that, please post a list of packages and their maintainer
> "IS" == Iryna Shcherbina writes:
IS> The packages that violate the above-mentioned policies are being
IS> tracked in portingdb [3] and we plan to start filling bugs soon.
Before doing that, please post a list of packages and their maintainers
to the devel list. Preferably you would post t
The reason behind the second change is that there are a lot of Python 2
only packages having `python-xxx` in Requires, which will start pulling
Python 3 dependencies when we switch to Python 3 as default. This will
most possibly cause a number of unexpected issues, which is what we are
trying t
10 matches
Mail list logo
