Il 12/09/2016 16:36, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> On 12.9.2016 16:32, Germano Massullo wrote:
>> 2016-09-12 15:37 GMT+02:00 Igor Gnatenko :
>>> It depends on application/we-application.
>>> If it's not supposed to "import foo", then it's fine to build only
>>> one version.
>>
>> Does the following re
2016-09-12 16:44 GMT+02:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> Well, you package it -> you tell us if it fall into that case ;)
>
> If you don't know what you package probably it's better to not package it?
I knew what to do but I asked since during package review the reviewer
pointed out that there should be both
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Germano Massullo
wrote:
> 2016-09-12 15:37 GMT+02:00 Igor Gnatenko :
>> It depends on application/we-application.
>> If it's not supposed to "import foo", then it's fine to build only one
>> version.
>
> Does the following review request fall into that case?
> pyt
On 12.9.2016 16:32, Germano Massullo wrote:
2016-09-12 15:37 GMT+02:00 Igor Gnatenko :
It depends on application/we-application.
If it's not supposed to "import foo", then it's fine to build only one version.
Does the following review request fall into that case?
python-django-netjsongraph - R
2016-09-12 15:37 GMT+02:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> It depends on application/we-application.
> If it's not supposed to "import foo", then it's fine to build only one
> version.
Does the following review request fall into that case?
python-django-netjsongraph - Reusable django app for collecting and
vis
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Hi, I have a question about Python applications and web applications.
> I remember (but I am not 100% sure) that I have been told that if the
> application / web application runs on Fedora, the packager will just
> have to make the Python3
