On 06/02/2016 10:25 AM, Rajeshkumar Pothiappan wrote:
> Thanks Charalampos Stratakis,
> I would like to package
> http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/pkg/python-fsmonitor/
> yograterol is maintaining that package.
> How to contact yograterol ?
> Can i use yograte...@fedoraproject.org or any other way?
Thanks Charalampos Stratakis,
I would like to package
http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/pkg/python-fsmonitor/
yograterol is maintaining that package.
How to contact yograterol ?
Can i use yograte...@fedoraproject.org or any other way?
Regards,
Rajeshkumar.P
__
Hi again.
Personally I believe for starters the best way would be to package a python
module which has no binaries, or any other "weird" stuff in regards to it like
Makefiles, documentation building and so on.
The best way to distinguish that is to go to the SPEC file of the RPM that you
are i
I am not aware of Python Spec file, and I can work in Python projects too .
I know core python well , I would like to contribute.
But I dont know where to start,what to do ,,
By random browsing , I found porting pacages from Python 2 to Python 3.
It would be better if i were given a beginer leve
Thanks Charalampos,Thomas and others.
I am interested in porting Python code.
While choosing an Idle package, what are the other things I have to note ?
ie. you said some downstream,
For your information,I am a noob in Fedora Development
___
python-deve
Hi Rajesh!
the `binclock` project is a bit problematic. As you can see in the note
on the left side on the PortingDB, the upstream for this project is
abandoned, emails bounce. If you go look into the Bugzilla link on the
same page, you'll also find that someone has made a Python 3 patch, but
Hello,
As it seems there is already an open bug regarding this package [0]
The patch that is posted there ports binclock to python 3 however the
maintainer hasn't responded as of yet. So the porting work has already been
done basically, as a downstream patch at least, only the changes need to b
