Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-03-07 Thread Matthias Runge
On 05/03/12 07:56, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > I'm not sure about that. I think it's not necessary, but let the other guys > speak and say what they think. > In my opinion, F17 and F18 should be enough. Ok, after thinking about this, I'd request only f18 and master. There is no real change besides t

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-03-07 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - > On 05/03/12 07:56, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > I'm not sure about that. I think it's not necessary, but let the > > other guys speak and say what they think. > > In my opinion, F17 and F18 should be enough. > > Ok, after thinking about this, I'd request only f18 and m

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-03-07 Thread Matthias Runge
On 07/03/12 13:51, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > I'm not sure I understand you. If I am not mistaken, then F18 is > master - did you mean F17 and master? Wah, no, I mean just F18 (our current master). I thought we won't include the rename in F17, right? Matthias -- Matthias Runge ___

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-03-07 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - > On 07/03/12 13:51, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand you. If I am not mistaken, then F18 is > > master - did you mean F17 and master? > Wah, no, I mean just F18 (our current master). > > I thought we won't include the rename in F17, right? > > Mat