On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 03:55:26AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > > - Original Message - (From Nick)
> > > >
> > > > I believe Fedora uses Python for more core OS infrastructure than
> > > > Ubunt
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 03:50:56AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:42:02AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > >
On 08/04/2012 02:19 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I suggest that you start by asking nicely what things need to be done to
> port those things to python2 and then go to work on doing them. Trying to
> force a change via the Feature process is reversing the order of things.
> Features don't exist to
On 08/06/2012 04:22 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The only distribution that has switched is arch. When they did there was
> a big uproar about how arch was doing something wrong which eventually
> resulted in that PEP.
Yeah, we mainly wrote PEP 394 in order to nudge *everyone else* into
providing
On 08/03/2012 11:15 PM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
> What is the benefit of using python3 as primary version in Fedora, Other
> than generate at lot of extra work for developers.
> Python3 is just like another language, so you will put
> extra maintenance work on developers who make system tool