Inconsistencies in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python

2016-03-21 Thread Tomas Orsava
Hi, according to the "Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python" [0] the "Example common spec file" [1] contained in those very same guidelines is wrong. Specifically, the section "Naming" [2] in the guidelines says the following: (1) "Both python 2 and python 3 variants must provide symlinks with a

Re: Inconsistencies in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python

2016-03-21 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "TO" == Tomas Orsava writes: TO> Hi, according to the "Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python" [0] TO> the "Example common spec file" [1] contained in those very same TO> guidelines is wrong. I think you misunderstand. TO> Specifically, the section "Naming" [2] in the guidelines says the

Re: Inconsistencies in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python

2016-03-21 Thread Tomas Orsava
> But this section explicitly only covers the rare case where a py2 and > py3 version of something provide _different_ functionality. > The example spec is for the normal case. That's why it's up above the > "Avoiding collisions between the python 2 and python 3 stacks" section. > That section cov

Re: Inconsistencies in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python

2016-03-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:46:00PM -, Tomas Orsava wrote: > Since the spec file does package both p2 and p3 versions of the executable There's a difference between *modules* (in the Python sense, i.e. Python libraries) and *executables*. We almost always want to provide modules for both Python

Re: Inconsistencies in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python

2016-03-21 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 21.3.2016 20:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:46:00PM -, Tomas Orsava wrote: Since the spec file does package both p2 and p3 versions of the executable There's a difference between *modules* (in the Python sense, i.e. Python libraries) and *executables*.

Re: Inconsistencies in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python

2016-03-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21.3.2016 20:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:46:00PM -, Tomas Orsava wrote: >>> >>> Since the spec file does package both p2 and p3 versions of the >>> executable >> >> >> There's a difference bet

Re: Inconsistencies in the Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python

2016-03-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:35:03PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 21.3.2016 20:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:46:00PM -, Tomas Orsava wrote: > >>> > >>> Since the spec file does package both p2

Re: [Marketing] Help Getting Started - Python Talking Points and Meetings

2016-03-21 Thread Justin W. Flory
Hi James, On 03/18/2016 03:41 PM, James Bishop wrote: Hi Justin The biggest question I have right now is whether I need to be a part of the marketing group to log in to the other sites. I have an FAS account, and the CLA has been signed, but when I try to sign on to the TRAC, I get a "you are n