Re: [RFC] RPM's Python dependency generator

2016-12-01 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote: > On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote: >>> >>> I don't think the depgen should be enabled by default, at least not in >>> the >>> foreseeable future. IIRC it's not that well implem

Re: [RFC] RPM's Python dependency generator

2016-12-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote: >> On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote: I don't think the depgen should be enabled by default, at least not in >

Re: [RFC] RPM's Python dependency generator

2016-12-01 Thread Tomas Orsava
On 12/01/2016 02:36 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: We'll see how it will go. we have depgen for pkgconfig, libraries, etc. for many years and people don't go and debug it immediately, but for many of packages it will help a lot. Anyhow, we'll see after couple of releases. Yeah, absolutely. When it's

Re: [RFC] RPM's Python dependency generator

2016-12-01 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 12/01/2016 02:42 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote: On 11/30/2016 02:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote: I don't think the depgen should be enabled by