Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

2022-06-21 Thread Tomas Hrnciar
Hello Mark, I replied in the upstream issue. I also think that this error looks like a problem in Cython. Could you please open an upstream report? Have a nice day. Tomas On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:11 PM Mark E. Fuller wrote: > On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > > > > ## Where to

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

2022-06-21 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 20. 06. 22 22:11, Mark E. Fuller wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > ## Where to get help > > Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat)or Matrix (#python:fedoraproject.org ). > > --- >

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

2022-06-21 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 21. 06. 22 12:51, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 20. 06. 22 22:11, Mark E. Fuller wrote: On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:  >  > ## Where to get help  >  > Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on #fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat)or Matrix (#python:fedoraproject.org <

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)

2022-06-21 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 21. 06. 22 16:27, Steven A. Falco wrote: On 6/20/22 07:45 AM, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.11side tag to Rawhide, despite several builds not succeeding. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for

python-migen (Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11)

2022-06-21 Thread Gabriel L. Somlo
Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 01:45:07PM +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > [...] > If your package fails because there is a non-dependency problem, you > might have already received a bugzilla from us in the past. If the build > failure is related to changes in Python 3.11, it should contain some > hint

Re: python-migen (Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11)

2022-06-21 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 21. 06. 22 17:28, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: Otherwise, what's the avilable timeframe I have to try and figure it out in time for F37 (assuming upstream doesn't start caring about Python 3.11*before* then)? Assuming this is a leaf package (which it appears to be) and assuming you want it pres