On 01. 03. 22 17:49, Major Hayden wrote:
On 3/1/22 10:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is
rather late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a leaf
package I think this might be a good idea.
That sounds like a
On 3/1/22 10:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is
rather late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a
leaf package I think this might be a good idea.
That sounds like a good plan to me. Thanks for doing the work on
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello Pythonistas.
>
> Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is
> rather late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a leaf
> package I think this might be a good idea.
+1
Zbyszek
Hello Pythonistas.
Do you think we should make /usr/bin/pypy3 PyPy 3.9 in Fedora 36? It is rather
late in the release cycle, but considering this is essentially a leaf package I
think this might be a good idea.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 3/1/22 07:06, Ben Beasley wrote:
I’d like to find some reviewers to clear out my backlog of mostly-Python
packages. These vary from near-trivial to moderately complicated.
I’m happy to review packages in exchange. I’m particularly comfortable
with C, C++, and Python, but reviewing other
I’d like to find some reviewers to clear out my backlog of mostly-Python
packages. These vary from near-trivial to moderately complicated.
I’m happy to review packages in exchange. I’m particularly comfortable
with C, C++, and Python, but reviewing other kinds of packages is a
possibility. It
