On Apr 27, 2017, at 06:21 AM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>For whatever it’s worth, at some point in time I plan on attempting to
>formalize the Debian solution (or something akin to it) within a PEP and try
>to get baked in support for it in Python.
>
>I also feel required to point out that ``sudo pip u
On Apr 27, 2017, at 04:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>From my perspective, the main goal of the change is to make it
>possible to fully recover from "sudo pip install " by doing
>"sudo pip uninstall ", and the approach Debian took is
>sufficient to achieve that in almost all cases. So +1 from me for
On Apr 27, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>Fedora's equivalent to dirtbike is rewheel [0][1] and it would be great if
>these projects could be unified somehow, however that's a separate
>conversation for another time.
>
>I'd be happy to take a closer look at dirtbike and maybe ini
On Apr 28, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>My recollection from the last time I looked at this was that where
>rewheel assumes that the Python level PEP 376 package metadata will be
>available, dirtbike instead queried the operating system level
>metadata.
dirtbike consults a list of "str
