Re: Macronize %package -n python3-foo?

2021-03-16 Thread Jos de Kloe
Hi Miro, in general I think explicit is better than implicit (and since I am Dutch, this seems obvious to me). But regarding your question, I think a better argument for creating a macro is to prevent mistakes from packagers. I think that is more relevant than avoiding a few lines of code in a

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.10 (and what to do)

2021-06-08 Thread Jos de Kloe
I am seeing this error when trying to build locally using mock: Error: Problem: package python3-xarray-0.17.0-1.fc35.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.9, but none of the providers can be installed - package python3-devel-3.10.0~b2-3.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with python3 < 3.10.0~b2-3.fc35 provide

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

2023-07-03 Thread Jos de Kloe
Hi Tomáš, I have been looking at this one: > python-metar jdekloe and I think it needs to be fixed upstream before it can be build for python3.12. Of course the failing tests can be disabled, but that may just hide that the module is crippled. So I opened this issue upstream: https:

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

2023-07-04 Thread Jos de Kloe
; On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:43 PM Jos de Kloe <mailto:josdek...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Tomáš, I have been looking at this one:  > python-metar         jdekloe and I think it needs to be fixed upstream before it can be build for python3.12. Of course the failing te