Hi list,
with a recent rpmlint, there will be a new warning
'private-shared-object-provides'. This will always trigger a *.so file
inside of %{python_sitearch} as a wrong dependency:
"""
A shared object soname provides is provided by a file in a path from
which other packages should not directly l
n porting to python3 (and own some python3
packages in fedora already). Right now, I'm quite busy in university
(at least for the next few weeks). After that, I'll have more time to
help working on it!
Just subscribed to python-porting list too. :-)
--
Thomas Spura
__
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> So you want to actually get this into F17? I'm not sure that this is a good
> idea, the time is short and only two of us have stated their opinions, so
> let's wait for more people and then make the decision. If we really agree on
> th
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787712
> Hi, thanks for looking into this. I am however more concerned that
> this patch goes into both F17 and F16-updates. Who can do it? Can I?
Any provenpackager, yes.
I just have appli
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Thomas Spura
wrote:
> I just have applied that patch here and get a failure in test_ssl:
> FAIL: test_openssl_version (test.test_ssl.BasicSocketTests)
> --
> Traceback (most rece
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to start a discussion about the release where we should switch to
> Python 3. As I have learned recently, Ubuntu 12.10 will have Python 3 as
> default [1], which makes me a sad panda :(
> We always take pride in being close
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> However, I think it's enough to place a clear upper limit on the number
> of runtimes to be supported (where 'x' is the relevant minor version
> packaged in the Fedora repos): CPython 2.x, PyPy 1.x, Python 3.x (with
> shared site-packages)
I
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Nick Coghlan
> > wrote:
> > > However, I think it's enough to place a clear upper limit on the
> > > number
> > > of runtimes to be supported (where 'x' is the relevant min
Hi all,
there just was a request to test groups for pkgdb2 [1] and I thought
it might be a good opportunity to maybe start sharing at least some
core python packages among a few people.
For instance, I maintain ipython and the dependency chain when other
maintainers chose to orphan something I ne
2014-10-07 9:10 GMT+02:00 Bohuslav Kabrda :
> - Original Message -
>> Hi all,
>>
>> there just was a request to test groups for pkgdb2 [1] and I thought
>> it might be a good opportunity to maybe start sharing at least some
>> core python packages among a few people.
>>
>> For instance, I m
Do you have the file "/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.2/cc1plus"
on your system as that's called from gcc later on.
It seems your installation broke, so maybe that file is gone now.
What is the output of "yum reinstall gcc-c++"? You only wrote "you got
errors"...
Brad Bell schrieb am Mo
Hi,
it took a bit longer than expected to get the FAS group sorted [1], yet it
should be possible now to add the "group::python-sig" to existing and new
python packages [2-3].
So feel free to add packages to:
* add group::python-sig to python related packages
* add yourself to the python-sig FAS
Pete Travis schrieb am Mon Jan 26 2015 at 5:24:32 PM:
> On 01/26/2015 08:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since bug #1126521 seems to be progressing nicely, I think it would be
> > nice to get in touch with python-sig, the maintainers of
> > python3-dateutil, about retiri
Nick Coghlan schrieb am Do., 26. Feb. 2015 um
00:14 Uhr:
> On 5 February 2015 at 17:48, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 4 February 2015 at 21:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> I don't really feel strongly about this, I agree that your solution
> has a
> >>> merit (an
Jason L Tibbitts III schrieb am Fr., 31. Juli 2015 um
03:51 Uhr:
> > "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:
>
> JLT> Also, When using the python_provide macro as detailed in the
> JLT> guidelines, I can't seem to get fedpkg to generate an srpm:
>
> OK, I think a question mark somehow got converte
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am Fr., 31. Juli
2015 um 06:06 Uhr:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 07:34:48PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > After some additional discussion and cleanup, I've gone ahead and moved
> > my drafts into place in the main guidelines. Please let me know if I've
The current matplotlib maintainer is happily accepting co-maintainers :)
So feel free to submit a review request for cycler or even better help
Thomas to create one to become the maintainer of his own (upstream) package.
Best,
Thomas
Neal Becker schrieb am Fr., 30. Okt. 2015 um
15:46 Uhr:
>
Nick Coghlan schrieb am Mo., 7. März 2016, 09:42:
> The pkgdb currently has the ability to automatically monitor for new
> upstream releases and attempt scratch builds in Koji when they're
> published. "rebase-helper" was recently integrated into that so the
> automated rebuilds are more likely t
Philippe Makowski schrieb am So., 17. Apr. 2016
um 19:29 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> just in case, I started to package ipython 4 and Jupyter in Mageia..
> my progress is there https://wiki.mageia.org/en/User:Philippem
>
> may be it could help for Fedora.
>
Thank you for your effort. It is of help to see whi
Jonathan Underwood schrieb am Mo., 18. Apr.
2016 um 12:04 Uhr:
> On 18 April 2016 at 08:06, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > Any help on reviewing new packages for ipython/jupyter and
> (co-)maintaining
> > the ipython stack is welcome. Are there any volunteers? :)
>
>
> Am ha
Petr Viktorin schrieb am Do., 28. Apr. 2016, 15:04:
> I've applied to the python-sig FAS group and mailing list. According to
> [SIG page] I also need to introduce myself, so here goes:
>
> Hello!
> I'm the keeper of [PortingDB], team lead in Red Hat's Python Maintenance
> team, and I'm generally
;> insider in some circles. My observation has been that Red Hat employees
> >> have been gently reminded on #fedora-python that they need to apply to
> >> python-sig. I am assuming they have been successful. Meanwhile, I wait
> >> for action on the part of a member of
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am Sa., 10. Dez.
2016 um 23:50 Uhr:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 05:41:45PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:56:44PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > >> Along simil
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am Mo., 12. Dez.
2016, 02:59:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 11:24:54AM +0000, Thomas Spura wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am Sa., 10. Dez.
> > 2016 um 23:50 Uhr:
> >
> > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 05:41:45PM -0500, Ne
Christian Dersch schrieb am Mi., 5. Apr. 2017 um
11:19 Uhr:
> On 04/05/2017 11:03 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > OK, proposal:
> >
> > Recommend from pythonX-ipykernel:
> >
> > pythonX-matplotlib
> > pythonX-numpy
> > pythonX-pandas
> > pythonX-scipy
> >
> > Have @pythonX-sci
Miro Hrončok schrieb am Sa., 6. Okt. 2018, 06:54:
> Welcome \o/
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Qulogic
>
>
Welcome Elliott! :)
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le
26 matches
Mail list logo
