portingdb

2017-10-05 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
What is the story with the python3 portingdb instance ( http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/)? It's been down for quite a while now. Troy ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Python 3 porting Bugzilla guidance

2017-09-27 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:01 AM Petr Viktorin wrote: > It's only automatic for Bugzilla. If upstream is not using the Fedora/RH > bugzilla (which it shouldn't, really), a URL for the upstream discussion > needs to be added manually. And of course you can open a portingdb >

Re: Package submission question

2017-09-04 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:54 AM Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/04/2017 06:21 AM, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: > > I have a version of the gpsd package which I believe addresses this > > ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390812. I've been >

Question about working with upstream vs patches

2017-09-01 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
Howdy, I'd like to help work toward the Fedora move toward Python 3. There is lots of good information out there about much of the process, but I did have a few questions about how you like to do things, and the proper work-flow. If I start working on a particular package, should I mention as

Re: Question about working with upstream vs patches

2017-09-02 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 7:40 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2.9.2017 05:53, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: > > Howdy, > > Hi Troy, > > > I'd like to help work toward the Fedora move toward Python 3. There is > > lots of good information out there

Package submission question

2017-09-03 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
I have a version of the gpsd package which I believe addresses this ticket https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390812. I've been looking around about the right way to submit. I thought it would be by using a pull request from within the pagure instance at src.fedoraproject.org. However,

Re: Parselmouth Badge

2017-11-06 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017, 5:02 AM Petr Viktorin <pvikt...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/05/2017 08:39 PM, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: > > So, do upstream contributions count toward Parselmouth badges? ;) > > I'm afraid the way they're set up now, they're just for the Fedora > packages

Extension Build Question/Recommendation

2017-10-21 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
I'd like to know what everyone's take on the best way to build python extensions for both python2 and python3 when the upstream build system can only build for one at time. The path I took for the gpsd update I submitted was to use two independent source trees, then build one for python2 and

Guidance for a python package update

2023-05-29 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
I'm currently working on the update for python-Levenshtein [1] and I have a question about the best way to proceed. In the intervening time since the last release we have packaged, a new maintainer has taken over maintenance, and built the updates around a stack of other packages (rapidfuzz-cpp,

Re: Guidance for a python package update

2023-05-30 Thread Troy Curtis Jr
On Tue, May 30, 2023, 3:13 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi Troy. > > On 29. 05. 23 18:01, Troy Curtis Jr wrote: > > I'm currently working on the update for python-Levenshtein [1] and I > have a > > question about the best way to proceed. > > > > In the intervening