Re: Python spec template violates guidelines?
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > > > So: > > F32 has rpmdevtools 8.10, which was first released... over three > > years > > ago > > > > * Sat Jan 14 2017 Ville Skyttä - 8.10-1 > > > > The spec in pagure is updated (including a patch Miro committed > > last > > year), but looks like it's only built for F33 and F34 right now. > > > > Neal, we should be able to release this for F32, right? Most > > packagers > > are likely to still be on it rather than on the recently branched > > F33 > > so it probably would save some review time. > > > > I am not releasing rpmdevtools 9.x to F32 or older because I've > changed default behaviors for 9.0 and replaced the spectool > implementation. > Ack. That probably means I'll run F33 sooner rather than later, at least in a toolbox container. Thanks, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm chat via email: https://delta.chat/ GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python spec template violates guidelines?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:16 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but > > > the > > > output > > > (when I run this on Fedora 32) is really severely outdated beyond > > > being any > > > useful. I remember trying to update the template many years ago but > > > got stuck at > > > EPEL-compatibility issues. > > > > > Neal maintains rpmdevtools, both on src.fp.o and on Pagure > > > > I'll get a PR in to make the Python spec a bit more up to date. This > > brings to mind that I've been intendeing to have a spec template and > > a > > packaging guideline for Lua for a while; that can go next. > > > So: > F32 has rpmdevtools 8.10, which was first released... over three years > ago > > * Sat Jan 14 2017 Ville Skyttä - 8.10-1 > > The spec in pagure is updated (including a patch Miro committed last > year), but looks like it's only built for F33 and F34 right now. > > Neal, we should be able to release this for F32, right? Most packagers > are likely to still be on it rather than on the recently branched F33 > so it probably would save some review time. > I am not releasing rpmdevtools 9.x to F32 or older because I've changed default behaviors for 9.0 and replaced the spectool implementation. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python spec template violates guidelines?
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:16 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but > > the > > output > > (when I run this on Fedora 32) is really severely outdated beyond > > being any > > useful. I remember trying to update the template many years ago but > > got stuck at > > EPEL-compatibility issues. > > > Neal maintains rpmdevtools, both on src.fp.o and on Pagure > > I'll get a PR in to make the Python spec a bit more up to date. This > brings to mind that I've been intendeing to have a spec template and > a > packaging guideline for Lua for a while; that can go next. > So: F32 has rpmdevtools 8.10, which was first released... over three years ago * Sat Jan 14 2017 Ville Skyttä - 8.10-1 The spec in pagure is updated (including a patch Miro committed last year), but looks like it's only built for F33 and F34 right now. Neal, we should be able to release this for F32, right? Most packagers are likely to still be on it rather than on the recently branched F33 so it probably would save some review time. Best, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm chat via email: https://delta.chat/ GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python spec template violates guidelines?
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 08. 20 19:59, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Per https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782, "Forbid
> > %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files" Python packages should not
> > blindly glob contents of the sitelib/sitearch directories.
> >
> > This makes sense, in fact, I just got bit by this packaging python-
> > sphinx-hoverxref (
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872508)
> > -- for some reason a `tests` directory also get copied to buildroot
> > and
> > thus get packaged.
> >
> > `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` still produces a spec with globbing
> > though.
> > This is just a matter of omission, I presume? I can put up a PR
> > fixing
> > this.
>
> I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but the
> output
> (when I run this on Fedora 32) is really severely outdated beyond
> being any
> useful. I remember trying to update the template many years ago but
> got stuck at
> EPEL-compatibility issues.
>
Neal maintains rpmdevtools, both on src.fp.o and on Pagure
I'll get a PR in to make the Python spec a bit more up to date. This
brings to mind that I've been intendeing to have a spec template and a
packaging guideline for Lua for a while; that can go next.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keybase.io/michel_slm
chat via email: https://delta.chat/
GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Python spec template violates guidelines?
On 26. 08. 20 19:59, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Per https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782, "Forbid
%{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files" Python packages should not
blindly glob contents of the sitelib/sitearch directories.
This makes sense, in fact, I just got bit by this packaging python-
sphinx-hoverxref (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872508)
-- for some reason a `tests` directory also get copied to buildroot and
thus get packaged.
`rpmdev-newspec python-foo` still produces a spec with globbing though.
This is just a matter of omission, I presume? I can put up a PR fixing
this.
I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but the output
(when I run this on Fedora 32) is really severely outdated beyond being any
useful. I remember trying to update the template many years ago but got stuck at
EPEL-compatibility issues.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
