Re: help wanted with modern Python packaging macros (%generate_buildrequires, %tox)

2020-11-16 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi Miro, just wanted to say thank you. It took me much longer than expected to actually try your suggestions but they were spot-on. :-) Felix ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: help wanted with modern Python packaging macros (%generate_buildrequires, %tox)

2020-09-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 11. 09. 20 1:11, Miro Hrončok wrote: Side note 0: I see the tox config also has: [testenv] extras = dev This is something the %pyproject_buildrequires don't understand yet, I'll open a bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877977 Side note 1: I see you have:

Re: help wanted with modern Python packaging macros (%generate_buildrequires, %tox)

2020-09-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 11. 09. 20 0:23, Felix Schwarz wrote: My main problem is shown at the end of this mail: Somehow the Python extras subpackage name is bad but I don't know how to debug this (without spending a lot of time). The error is: Error: The package name contains an extras name `easyname` that was

help wanted with modern Python packaging macros (%generate_buildrequires, %tox)

2020-09-10 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi, I wanted to update python-dns-lexicon. Version 3.4 uses poetry and tox so I thought it would be a good idea to get a grip on %generate_buildrequires, %tox etc. Unfortunately I'm a bit stuck at the moment. Maybe this is just because I'm starring for too long on some spec file (and probably my