On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Does it require a PEP just to add one more
> format code? (Maybe it will, if the format code requires a complete
> re-write of the entire module.)
Yes, I think a PEP would be useful in this case. The proposed change
Nevertheless the C meaning *is* the etymology of the module name. :-)
--Guido (mobile)
On Jan 19, 2017 16:54, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:16:28AM +1100, Chris
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:16:28AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> To be fair, the name "struct" implies a C-style structure, which
>> _does_ have a fixed size, or at least fixed offsets for its members
>
>
> Ah,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 05:16:28AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> To be fair, the name "struct" implies a C-style structure, which
> _does_ have a fixed size, or at least fixed offsets for its members
Ah, the old "everyone thinks in C terms" fallacy raises its ugly head
agan :-)
The name
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:31:03AM +, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > [...] struct already supports
> > variable-width formats.
>
> Unfortunately, that's not really true: the Pascal strings it supports
> are in some
Construct has radical API changes and should remain apart. It feels to me
like a straw-man to introduce a large library to the discussion as
justification for it being too-specialized.
This proposal to me seems much more modest: add another format character
(or two) to the existing set of a dozen
I haven't had a chance to use it myself yet, but I've heard good things
about
https://construct.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
It's certainly far more comprehensive than struct for this and other
problems.
As usual, there's some tension between adding stuff to the stdlib versus
using more
ctypes.Structure is *literally* the interface to the C struct that as Chris
mentions has fixed offsets for all members. I don't think that should
(can?) be altered.
In file formats (beyond net protocols) the string size + variable length
string motif comes up often and I am frequently
I am for upgrading struct to these, if possible.
But besides my +1, I am writting in to remember folks thatthere is another
"struct" model in the stdlib:
ctypes.Structure -
For reading a lot of records with the same structure it is much more handy than
struct, since it gives one a suitable
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Elizabeth Myers
wrote:
> I do understand it might require a possible major rewrite or major
> changes the struct module, but in the long run, I think it's worth it
> (especially because the struct module is not all that big in scope). As
On 19/01/17 05:58, Rhodri James wrote:
> On 19/01/17 08:31, Mark Dickinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>>> [...] struct already supports
>>> variable-width formats.
>>
>> Unfortunately, that's not really true: the Pascal strings it
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> [...] struct already supports
> variable-width formats.
Unfortunately, that's not really true: the Pascal strings it supports
are in some sense variable length, but are stored in a fixed-width
field. The internals of
12 matches
Mail list logo