On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 04:50:07PM +0200, George Fischhof
wrote:
> yes, something like that ... ;-) but I use windows, and I want the feature
> in Python, with a simple and elegant way (1-2 commands)
>
> 2017-05-05 16:14 GMT+02:00 Oleg Broytman :
>
> > On
yes, something like that ... ;-) but I use windows, and I want the feature
in Python, with a simple and elegant way (1-2 commands)
2017-05-05 16:14 GMT+02:00 Oleg Broytman :
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 03:55:37PM +0200, George Fischhof <
> geo...@fischhof.hu> wrote:
> > Actually
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 03:55:37PM +0200, George Fischhof
wrote:
> Actually it would be good if copytree() would be able to overwrite files
> and directories.
Seems you want rsync, no?
> George
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmanhttp://phdru.name/
2017-05-05 13:02 GMT+02:00 Oleg Broytman :
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:58:15AM +0200, George Fischhof <
> geo...@fischhof.hu> wrote:
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I have a task to synchronize folders but some files should be remained
> > untouched.
>
>Synchronize folders
Hi!
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:58:15AM +0200, George Fischhof
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I have a task to synchronize folders but some files should be remained
> untouched.
Synchronize folders using rmtree()? I don't get it.
> I think this is a very common task.
I
2017-05-05 11:52 GMT+02:00 Serhiy Storchaka :
> On 05.05.17 10:58, George Fischhof wrote:
>
>> I have a task to synchronize folders but some files should be remained
>> untouched.
>> I think this is a very common task.
>>
>> I found that shutil.copytree() has
On 05.05.17 10:58, George Fischhof wrote:
I have a task to synchronize folders but some files should be remained
untouched.
I think this is a very common task.
I found that shutil.copytree() has ignore_patterns() but rmtree() has not.
So here comes my idea: add ignore_patterns() to rmtree() it
Hi Folks,
I have a task to synchronize folders but some files should be remained
untouched.
I think this is a very common task.
I found that shutil.copytree() has ignore_patterns() but rmtree() has not.
So here comes my idea: add ignore_patterns() to rmtree() it is a good
feature and makes the
On 5 May 2017 at 08:20, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Victor Stinner wrote:
>>
>> I prefer str.join() approach: write a single chunks() function which
>> takes a sequence, instead of modifying all sequence types around the
>> world ;-)
>
>
> Even if a general sequence-chunking