[Python-ideas] allow overriding files used for the input builtin

Hi there, I have posted an idea for improvement with a PR of an implementation to https://bugs.python.org/issue31603. The basic idea is to add fin, fout, and ferr file object parameters and default to using what is used today when the args are not specified. I believe this would be useful

Re: [Python-ideas] Changes to the existing optimization levels

Perhaps I should be a bit clearer. When I said the "level 3" approach "appears to be inline with the direction Victor Stinner is going in for PEP 511", it was mostly at a superficial level. Meaning: - PEP 511 still appears to use integer (unnamed) optimization levels for alternate transformers

Re: [Python-ideas] Changes to the existing optimization levels

Yup. I referenced your pep a few times in a previous off-list email, but I omitted that paragraph from this pass because I was using it to bolster the previous "level 3" idea (which didn't fly). """ This simple approach to new optimization levels also appears to be inline with the direction

Re: [Python-ideas] Changes to the existing optimization levels

> 2) Added a new command line option N that allows you to specify > any number of individual optimization flags. > > For example: > > python -N nodebug -N noassert -N nodocstring You may want to look at my PEP 511 which proposes to add a new "-o" option to specify a list of

Re: [Python-ideas] PEP 560 (second post)

On 28 September 2017 at 08:27, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 27 September 2017 at 19:28, Ivan Levkivskyi > wrote: > > If an object that is not a class object appears in the bases of a class > > definition, the ``__subclass_base__`` is searched on it. If

Re: [Python-ideas] Changes to the existing optimization levels

On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 12:48:15 -0600 Diana Clarke wrote: > > 2) Added a new command line option N that allows you to specify > any number of individual optimization flags. > > For example: > > python -N nodebug -N noassert -N nodocstring We could