And in case it wasn't clear, "python-list" is here:
python-l...@python.org
Please try posting the same question there instead.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson
On 17Mar2019 16:23, David Mertz wrote:
This is an interesting challenge you have. However, this list is for
proposing ideas for changes in
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:34 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 01:13:29AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes, it will. Can you determine whether some code does this? Can you
> > recognize what kind of object is on the left of a percent sign?
> > Remember, it quite pos
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 01:13:29AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
[...]
> Yes, it will. Can you determine whether some code does this? Can you
> recognize what kind of object is on the left of a percent sign?
> Remember, it quite possibly won't be a literal.
I don't understand whether your question
This is an interesting challenge you have. However, this list is for
proposing ideas for changes in the Python language itself, in particular
the CPython reference implementation.
Python-list or some discussion site dealing with machine learning or
natural language processing would be appropriate
francismb writes:
> On 3/15/19 4:54 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > What 2to3 does is to handle a lot of automatic conversions, such as
> > flipping the identifiers from str to bytes and unicode to str. It was
> > necessary to have some such tool because of the very large amount of
> > suc
I am in desperate need of a dict similar structure that allows sets and/or
dicts as keys *and* values. My application is NLP conceptual plagiarism
detection. Dealing with infinite grammars communicating illogical
concepts. Would be even better if keys could nest the same data structure,
e.g. set(s)
On 3/15/19 11:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> And, are you going to run this function on every single code snippet
> before you try it?
If just trying, may be not. But yes, if I care to know where the
applicability limits are (interpreter versions) before integrating it.
IMHO I don't think it's a g
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 1:09 AM francismb wrote:
>
> On 3/15/19 11:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Python 3.5 introduced the modulo operator for bytes objects. How are
> > you going to write a function that determines whether or not a piece
> > of code depends on this?
> I'm not sure I understand
On 3/15/19 11:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Python 3.5 introduced the modulo operator for bytes objects. How are
> you going to write a function that determines whether or not a piece
> of code depends on this?
I'm not sure I understand the question. Isn't *a piece of code* that
does a modulo oper
On 3/15/19 9:02 PM, francismb wrote:
> And the operator is the function.exactly, function application/call
___
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/c
Hi Nick,
On 3/12/19 3:57 PM, Nick Timkovich wrote:
> The onus is on you
> to positively demonstrate you require both directions, not him to
> negatively demonstrate it's never required.
>From Calvin I just wanted to have some examples where he sees a use for
swapping operands (nothing to be demons
11 matches
Mail list logo
