On Jan 30, 2020, at 11:20, Johan Vergeer wrote:
>
> It is a couple of days later, but I managed to create a more expanded
> proposal.
>
> This proposal is about having a simple and consistent way of getting the name
> of an object.
> Whether it is a class, type, function, method or variable
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:39:29AM +0300, Mikhail V wrote:
> I would like to see possibility to put spaces
> between the string prefix and the string literal
> so I could write e.g. like this:
>
> print (f "x: {x}")
>
> IMO it would help with legibility especially
> noticable with by
The problem is that's ambiguous to the grammar whether you truly mean 'f'
as a prefix or 'f' as a variable and just happened to type something wrong.
And then debugging that would be horrible. So even if the grammar to
support it, I'm -1 on the idea.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:41 PM Mikhail V
It is a couple of days later, but I managed to create a more expanded proposal.
This proposal is about having a simple and consistent way of getting the name
of an object.
Whether it is a class, type, function, method or variable or any other object.
# Why?
## Usage in strings
The first
