I will explain it in the following few lines of code..
name = "George"
year = 2021
d = {"name": "Mike", "year": 1919}
match d:
case {"name": name, "year": 1917}:
print("match 1 found”)
# I want to remove binding "name" here from partial matching
Did you mean this Paul?
(a, b) >= (1, 2)
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://m
Fair enough. Whoever writes a PEP for this will need to do the
relevant research and present the arguments in detail. But until
someone's ready to write that PEP, we can continue discussing on the
assumption that if someone finds the async version useful, they'll
speak up.
Paul
On Fri, 12 Feb 202
I am not that familiar with asyncio either. I only wrote a few utility scripts
that runs concurrent subprocesses mixed with some blocking functions running in
concurrent.ProcessPoolExecutor pool (using asyncio.run_in_executor). That is
all what I did with regard asyncio. Your function f2 and my
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 7:57 PM Brendan Barnwell wrote:
>
> On 2021-02-11 03:24, J. Pic wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Lambdas can be defined as such:
> >
> > w = lambda: [12]
> > x = lambda y: len(y)
> >
> > I'd like to propose the following:
> >
> > w = (): [12]
> > x = (y): len(y)
> >
> > Or even a
On 08/02/2021 00:39, Brendan Barnwell wrote:
On 2021-02-07 09:59, Christopher Barker wrote:
All that being said, it's not that big a deal, and I personally don't
try to limit to 80 chars per line anyway -- preferring 90 or 95 -- I
haven't used a VT100 in decades
To be honest I find
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 09:26, Abdulla Al Kathiri
wrote:
>
> I actually like the “(x, y=7) => x + y” and “async (x, y) => asyncio.sleep(x
> + y)” for both normal and async anonymous functions respectfully.
I think it's a reasonable syntax, although it could be over-used.
That's not an issue with
I actually like the “(x, y=7) => x + y” and “async (x, y) => asyncio.sleep(x +
y)” for both normal and async anonymous functions respectfully. I have natural
aversion to the word lambda for some reason. The normal anon function has
“return” implicitly, and the async anon function has “return” im
On 2021-02-11 03:24, J. Pic wrote:
Hi all,
Lambdas can be defined as such:
w = lambda: [12]
x = lambda y: len(y)
I'd like to propose the following:
w = (): [12]
x = (y): len(y)
Or even another contraction for when there are no arguments:
w =: [12]
I don't see any need for this. It's eve
