It looks like the source moved here
https://github.com/mdn/archived-content/blob/main/files/en-us/mozilla/qa/bug_writing_guidelines/index.html
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Why not send a bug report about it to Mozilla?
On 16/08/2021 23:21, Thomas Grainger wrote:
It looks like it was removed unintentionally because the Mozilla
support pages still reference it
It looks like it was removed unintentionally because the Mozilla support
pages still reference it
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/contributors-guide-writing-good-bug#w_existing-guidelines-for-writing-your-first-bug
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021, 18:30 Jack DeVries, wrote:
> > Is there a reason why
On 16/08/2021 16:54, Mebale Tsige Araya wrote:
> Is there anybody who can help me, please? Can I run Python codes on
> Browser, please? If so could you have any idea how to run my codes on
> Browser?
Your question could mean several different things. I'll give
very brief answers to each below
> Is there a reason why we can't just link to the Wayback Machine copy like
> you did here?
That has been discussed on the bpo thread, we felt that is a clunky
solution. Another proposed solution on the bpo is for someone to write a
new document about making good bug reports, pertinent to the
Matsuoka Takuo writes:
> I don't see any parenthesis nor bracket around "1,2,".
Parentheses are not part of tuple display syntax, with the exception
of "()", the empty tuple. Parenthesis are needed for tuple displays
only to group the display in the context of a larger expression.
This is my
Abdulla Al Kathiri writes:
> You have a point, but the mathematical approach of Haskell of
> different function cases is quite readable and straight forward.
You seem to have quite missed that point, though. The point is that
although borrowing tech from Haskell for Python is a *great* idea
Jonathan Goble wrote:
> Is there a reason why we can't just link to the Wayback Machine copy like
> you did here?
>
I agree with that as immediate first aid. It seems that wikipedia practice
now is to link to both the original article and to a copy on the wayback
machine.
I've found some
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021, 10:30 AM Jack DeVries wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> We are trying to replace a link in the official docs which is now
> broken, but used to link to this article:
>
>
>
Hi All!
We are trying to replace a link in the official docs which is now
broken, but used to link to this article:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210613191914/https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/QA/Bug_writing_guidelines
Can you offer a suggestion for a replacement? The bad link
10 matches
Mail list logo
