On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:12:37AM -0400, Juancarlo Añez wrote:
> I won't propose a syntax, but I think it would be useful if *assert* could
> raise an exception different from *AssertionError*.
>
> This is in the context of "Design by contrast" (DBC) as a useful companion
> to "Test-driven develop
I'm not sure what you're proposing. What should its `__name__` be set to?
If you have a value you want its `__name__` to be, you can just set it yourself.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ide
If someone posted a Pull Request that added this, it would be looked upon
favorably I'm sure.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:31 AM Christopher Barker
wrote:
> it looks like this as had a BPO for over a year:
>
> https://bugs.python.org/issue40563
>
> I suggest pinging that (and maybe python-dev) to se
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:37 AM Simão Afonso <
simao.afo...@powertools-tech.com> wrote:
> On 2021-09-07 11:12:37, Juancarlo Añez wrote:
> > Basically, the proposal is to allow for an exception type and value to be
> > specified in *assert*, instead of the customary:
> >
> > if not assertion:
> >
On 2021-09-07 11:12:37, Juancarlo Añez wrote:
> Basically, the proposal is to allow for an exception type and value to be
> specified in *assert*, instead of the customary:
>
> if not assertion:
>
> raise ValueError('a message')
What's wrong with:
> if __debug__:
> if not assertion:
>
it looks like this as had a BPO for over a year:
https://bugs.python.org/issue40563
I suggest pinging that (and maybe python-dev) to see what's up.
NOTE: first check 3.10 :-)
-CHB
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 5:05 AM Evan Greenup via Python-ideas <
python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> Currently, in P
I won't propose a syntax, but I think it would be useful if *assert* could
raise an exception different from *AssertionError*.
This is in the context of "Design by contrast" (DBC) as a useful companion
to "Test-driven development" and other forms of external tests.
Basically, the proposal is to a
unittest.subTest, hypothesis @given + pytest
From
https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#distinguishing-test-iterations-using-subtests
:
```
When there are very small differences among your tests, for instance some
parameters, unittest allows you to distinguish them inside the body of a
t
On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 02:31 +, Leonardo Freua wrote:
> When writing some unit tests with the standard Unittest library, I missed
> being
> able to create parameterized tests. This functionality exists in PyTest
> (https://docs.pytest.org/en/6.2.x/parametrize.html) and there is also a
> librar
Currently, in Python 3.9, `dbm.open()`, `dbm.gnu.open()` and `dbm.ndbm.open()`
doesn't support path-like object, class defined in `pathlib`.
It would be nice to add support with it.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- py
functools introduces partial function. As I can see from the implementation,
partial functions are instance of `partial` class, and that __call__ is used to
"emulate" a function call.
On the other hand I guess people usually treat those as ordinary functions.
The thing here is that for functions
11 matches
Mail list logo
