On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 1:16 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:11:07PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> > > > Absolutely. However, this is not an "all Classes" question.
> > > Isn't it? I thought this was a proposal to allow any class to partake
> in
> > > the dataclass
On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 14:49, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> The `int()` function allows to specify a base to convert from, for example:
>
> >>> int("foo", 26)
> 10788
>
> Which is documented as:
>
> > The base defaults to 10. Valid bases are 0 and 2-36.
>
> For other common bases
Hey there,
The `int()` function allows to specify a base to convert from, for example:
>>> int("foo", 26)
10788
Which is documented as:
> The base defaults to 10. Valid bases are 0 and 2-36.
For other common bases functions exist in the base64 module in stdlib.
I often need other bases, or
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 9:35 AM Ethan Furman wrote:
> My own thoughts about the proposal: It seems interesting, and assigning
> as-is arguments is a chore -- but I'm not sure
> using up a token to help only one method per class is a good trade.
>
Is it unreasonable to instead suggest
On 5/1/22 00:21, Christopher Barker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 2:17 PM Pablo Alcain wrote:
>> It shows that out of 20k analyzed classes in the selected libraries
(including black,
>> pandas, numpy, etc), ~17% of them could benefit from the usage of
auto-assign syntax.
>
> I only read
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 11:54:47PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 6:40 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:11:07PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> > > Absolutely. However, this is not an "all Classes" question.
> >
> > Isn't it? I thought
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 2:17 PM Pablo Alcain wrote:
>
>>> B) Most __init__ params need specialized behavior, and are quite
>> distinct from what's needed by __eq__ and __repr__
>>
>> (B) is well covered by the current, you-need-to-specify-everything
>> approach.
>>
>
> I don’t see B as a
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 6:40 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:11:07PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> > Absolutely. However, this is not an "all Classes" question.
>
> Isn't it? I thought this was a proposal to allow any class to partake in
> the dataclass autoassignment
