What's the use-case for this?
Have you looked into using functools.partial instead?
On Sat, 22 Apr 2023, 06:23 Samuel Muldoon, wrote:
> Consider the following string:
>
> x = r"\mathjax{{color}}{{text}}"
>
> string `x` contains two parameters named `color` and the other named `text
> `.
>
> Cur
On 22/04/23 10:20 am, Samuel Muldoon wrote:
Can we change str.formatso that it is possible to change only one string
parameter, but leave the other parameters alone?
That would have the effect that every use of str.format for everyone
would start producing partially-formatted strings if an argu
Consider the following string:
x = r"\mathjax{{color}}{{text}}"
string `x` contains two parameters named `color` and the other named `text`.
Currently, python requires that the string class method `str.format` contain
key-word arguments for *all *parameters, not just *one* parameter
result = r"
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 22:57, Jordan Macdonald wrote:
> However, I then encountered an issue: I could define a Protocol that
> specified the 'stop()' method easily enough, but if I annotated the manager
> as taking that, it would accept any class which implemented a method named
> 'stop()', whi
We have a large codebase which uses threads. Many - but not all - of these
threads implement a method named 'stop()' which sets a flag, triggers an
event, closes a connection, or what-have-you in order to command the thread
in question to terminate.
I was writing a thread manager, intended to auto
