On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 8:37 AM James Addison via Python-ideas <
python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> ISTM the primary use cases advanced here have been for "naive" users.
>>> Likely they won't be in a position to decide whether they trust Guido
>>> van Rossum or Egg Rando more.
>>
>>
There are 718,15
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 16:25 Paul Moore wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 15:56, Stephen J. Turnbull <
> turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
>
>> James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
>>
>> > The implementation of such a system could either be centralized or
>> > distributed; the trust
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 15:56, Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
>
> > The implementation of such a system could either be centralized or
> > distributed; the trust signals that human users infer from it
> > should always be
I didn't really address your point there; indirectly mine was to reaffirm a
sense that not all participants may want to read the opinions of others
while learning technologies, and that's why I am skeptical of the
suggestions to include subjective user ratings of any kind within Python
packaging in
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 15:52 Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
>
> > The implementation of such a system could either be centralized or
> > distributed; the trust signals that human users infer from it
> > should always be d
James Addison via Python-ideas writes:
> The implementation of such a system could either be centralized or
> distributed; the trust signals that human users infer from it
> should always be distributed.
ISTM the primary use cases advanced here have been for "naive" users.
Likely they won't be
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023, 09:13 Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 18:06, James Addison via Python-ideas
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 02:11, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > > I have always thought that any community scoring system should allow
> > > other users to mark up/down other
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 18:06, James Addison via Python-ideas
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 02:11, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > I have always thought that any community scoring system should allow
> > other users to mark up/down other reviewers w.r.t the scores presented.
> > That markup should on
On Sun, 9 Jul 2023 at 02:11, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> On 04Jul2023 17:21, Christopher Barker wrote:
> >3) A rating system built into PyPi -- This could be a combination of
> >two
> >things:
> > A - Automated analysis -- download stats, dependency stats, release
> >frequency, etc, etc, etc.
> >
