> while a < b(x := c) - 42:
>># ???
I actually think this is the better parsing of the three: a SyntaxError.
Celelibi
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@pytho
e. The keyword at the begining of the
line doesn't matter.
Best regards,
Celelibi
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.pytho
us operator was precisely that it
makes the order of evaluation much more important to know in order to
understand a program.
Assuming a = 0, what does this do: print(a, (a := a + 1), a) ?
At least python makes it defined and obvious *when* the side effect
occurs... As long as you know that expressions are
a bare 'except'.
I think this could be made simpler by allowing 'else' without any 'except'.
Celelibi
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailm
2023-08-01 18:14 UTC+02:00, Chris Angelico :
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 02:02, Celelibi wrote:
>> If later on an "except" is added, the developper doing the
>> modification should be reminded to move the call to
>> no_error_occurred() into an "else". With
ual execution is the same.
In the first case you intend to only catch the exceptions generated by
do_stuff().
In the second case, you intend to catch those generated by do_stuff()
and those generated by no_error_occurred().
If later on an "except" is added, the developper doing the
modificat
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 03:47:05PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Hi, Celelibi,
>
> Welcome to Python Ideas.
>
> Python Dev is more for discussions of implementations of proposed
> features, typically clearly on their way to an accepted pull request
> into master. Pyt
Hello world,
I've been recently trying to switch from a library using gevent to a
library using asyncio. And do so without contaminating the whole code
with the "async" keyword in one go.
As expected, calling the synchronous code from a coroutine is pretty
straightforward. But the other way
cktracking of some
parts of the regex interact with the multi-state evaluation of the
other parts. But at least it exists and works, so it is feasible.
Best regards,
Celelibi
[1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-March/098354.html
[2] https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html
g = False
+return prevflag
def wait(self, timeout=None):
"""Block until the internal flag is true.
What do you think about it?
Best regards,
Celelibi
___
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://m
10 matches
Mail list logo
