The fact of explicit dependency noting is why I suggested something that
explicitly defines multiple imports in one line
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 9:28 PM Greg Ewing
wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > I find the imports at the top of the file to be a nice
> > catalog of
e <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 26 April 2018 at 14:29, Julian DeMille via Python-ideas
> > <python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> >> I personally would like a feature where instead of doing `from ...
> import
> >> ...` (which imports the specified items int
Some library authors get pretty pissy about implicit imports at the root
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018, 09:37 Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 April 2018 at 14:29, Julian DeMille via Python-ideas
> <python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> > I personally would like
I personally would like a feature where instead of doing `from ... import
...` (which imports the specified items into the current namespace), one
could use something along the lines of `import .{ , , ...
}` such that the imported modules/attributes could be accessed as
`.`, etc.
--
Thanks,