On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Franklin? Lee wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:52 AM Elazar wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 16:56 Philipp A. wrote:
> >>
> >> The main clause differentiating bad, weaponizable CoCs from good ones is
> >>
> >> "Assume good faith"
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:52 AM Elazar wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 16:56 Philipp A. wrote:
>>
>> The main clause differentiating bad, weaponizable CoCs from good ones is
>>
>> "Assume good faith"
>>
>> Everything will be OK if good faith can reasonably be assumed (E.g. when
>> someone
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 16:56 Philipp A. wrote:
> The main clause differentiating bad, weaponizable CoCs from good ones is
>
> "Assume good faith"
>
> Everything will be OK if good faith can reasonably be assumed (E.g. when
> someone uses a word which is only offensive based on context)
> On the
The main clause differentiating bad, weaponizable CoCs from good ones is
"Assume good faith"
Everything will be OK if good faith can reasonably be assumed (E.g. when
someone uses a word which is only offensive based on context)
On the other hand, e.g. obvious racial slurs never have a place on a
On 20/09/18 19:56, Brett Cannon wrote:
Based on the WG's recommendation and after discussing it with Titus, the
decision has been made to ban Jacco from python-ideas. Trivializing
assault, using the n-word, and making inappropriate comments about
someone's mental stability are all uncalled for
The below email was reported to the PSF board for code of conduct
violations and then passed on to the conduct working group to decide on an
appropriate response.
Based on the WG's recommendation and after discussing it with Titus, the
decision has been made to ban Jacco from python-ideas.
