On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 02:11:29AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> What Chris is suggesting is that several of the ideas you've proposed
> have had PEPs, or related ideas have had PEPs, so you would benefit
> from just reading the list of PEPs.
Its not just the PEPs, there are about two decad
Shreyan Avigyan writes:
> My Browser showed "No results" and a windows error sound could be
> heard. I couldn't find the PEP. If I did I would have studied a
> lot. I didn't have any idea this idea was proposed before and also
> had a PEP (unfortunately rejected)
You're very close to the lead
Reply to Chris:
My Browser showed "No results" and a windows error sound could be heard. I
couldn't find the PEP. If I did I would have studied a lot. I didn't have any
idea this idea was proposed before and also had a PEP (unfortunately rejected)
___
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:01 PM Shreyan Avigyan
wrote:
>
> I want to propose a try-except expression to handle expression errors not
> stmt errors (Yes I initially proposed stmt but now I'm changing it to
> expressions after I researched a little more and found it would make a whole
> lot of sen
Hmmm. Didn't show up as a search result. Yet I feel like it's really to good to
have that feature. (Again, it's the PEP dictator's decision.) :-(
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 08:58:36AM -, Shreyan Avigyan wrote:
> I want to propose a try-except expression to handle expression errors
Okay. What has changed since PEP 463 to justify writing a new PEP?
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0463/
--
Steve
_
I want to propose a try-except expression to handle expression errors not stmt
errors (Yes I initially proposed stmt but now I'm changing it to expressions
after I researched a little more and found it would make a whole lot of sense
for expressions.). For example - var if var else var2 - will r
Reply to Chris:
Yes you're right, I meant if-else expression.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message a
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:59 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:47:46AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > I can understand the confusion though, given that the parallel
> > constructs cited for justification are all expressions.
>
> "conditional statement, list comprehension
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:47:46AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> I can understand the confusion though, given that the parallel
> constructs cited for justification are all expressions.
"conditional statement, list comprehensions, dict comprehensions"
Two out of three is not bad. Conditional st
Why do you want this?
Is there a shortage of newlines in your country? Maybe the Enter key is
broken on your keyboard? *wink*
Writing a proposal without a motivation is not very likely to get very
far. "Put the code on one line" is not an acceptable motivation; *why*
do you want to put it on o
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 10:40 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 04:30:25PM -0400, Steele Farnsworth wrote:
>
> > This was proposed in 2014 and was rejected:
> > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0463/
>
> No, that's a proposal for a Python *expression* that can be imbedded in
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 04:30:25PM -0400, Steele Farnsworth wrote:
> This was proposed in 2014 and was rejected:
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0463/
No, that's a proposal for a Python *expression* that can be imbedded in
another expression.
Shreyan's proposal here is just to allow fitti
This was proposed in 2014 and was rejected:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0463/
That being said, I would support such a thing being added to the language.
My preferred syntax would be `try expression except ExceptionType [as e]
with alternative`, or even `expression except ExceptionType [as
14 matches
Mail list logo
