06.09.21 18:42, Chris Angelico пише:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:36 AM Finn Mason wrote:
>> Thank you for testing that. I dug through the change log, and found
>> bpo-12022:
>> https://bugs.python.org/issue12022
>> It has been fixed in 3.11, but not mentioned in the What's New document.
>>
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:36 AM Finn Mason wrote:
>
> Thank you for testing that. I dug through the change log, and found bpo-12022:
> https://bugs.python.org/issue12022
> It has been fixed in 3.11, but not mentioned in the What's New document.
> Should it be?
>
If it was indeed a side effect of
Thank you for testing that. I dug through the change log, and found
bpo-12022:
https://bugs.python.org/issue12022
It *has* been fixed in 3.11, but not mentioned in the What's New document.
Should it be?
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021, 5:49 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:37 AM Finn
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:37 AM Finn Mason wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> In Python 3.10 and 3.11, exception tracebacks are being greatly improved. I
> noticed that there's nothing related to a fairly common (in my personal
> experience) cryptic traceback relating to the `with` statement:
>
> >>>
