On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 4:20 AM Dom Grigonis wrote:
> Just to add. I think same methods would be useful to have for strings as
> well.
>
strings are immutable, so `pop` is out.
As for `get` -- it *could* be added to the sequence ABC, but very much
doubt that will ever happen -- adding something
Just to add. I think same methods would be useful to have for strings as well.
> On 14 Jun 2023, at 23:28, Dom Grigonis wrote:
>
> Yes,
> 1. adding keyword argument for `pop`
> 2. implementing `get` method as it doesn’t exist at all
> * This wouldn’t break anything for sure. Well… theoreticall
Yes,
1. adding keyword argument for `pop`
2. implementing `get` method as it doesn’t exist at all
* This wouldn’t break anything for sure. Well… theoretically could, but I
find it hard to imagine anyone has written such code.
I like PEP 463. Looks simple and intuitive.
> On 14 Jun 2023, at 23
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 06:04, Dom Grigonis wrote:
> So following Chris’ logic...
> If there are 10,000,000 python users on Stack…
> And we assume, that every user encounters such need at least 2 times a year
> (being very speculative here, would say conservative?).
That was me being VERY generou
