[Python-ideas] Re: Python including packages

On 08Jul2019 11:40, Siddharth Prajosh wrote: Hey all, after this talk on how useful standard libraries are this has been in talks in multiple channels. I just wanted to present my idea on the same. Why not keep the es

[Python-ideas] Re: Python including packages

> On 8 Jul 2019, at 12:19, Xavier Combelle wrote: > > Fifth, as far as I understand the core reason of the initial talk is that > twisted will support forever python 2, and as such demand that the whole > python ecosystem find workaround to allow this attitude. As I understand it Twisted ha

[Python-ideas] Re: Python including packages

Please don't! Python standard library can of course be improved with such a model, but the cost overwrite the beneficit by a large margin. First this proposition is not backward compatible. Basically it will break any script using such library for the first time if internet is not available. Seco

[Python-ideas] Re: Python including packages

Thanks, Cameron Simpson, for the feedback! The security issue you mentioned is something really serious I didn't really think about. I usually do this a lot for my side projects and random stuff I automate. Hence suggested this. Again, thanks for taking your time. On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 1:14 PM