Sorry if this double posted but I got a bounce from
python-id...@googlegroups.com the first time that I sent it. I resent to
python-ideas@python.org.
On Oct 29, 2018, at 3:07 AM, Neil Girdhar wrote:
>
> Why not just use pytest?
>
I could use pytest or Martin Richard's asynctest[1]. I want
Why not just use pytest?
On Wednesday, October 10, 2018 at 7:12:02 AM UTC-4, David Shawley wrote:
>
> Hi everyone and good morning to some of you,
>
> Since asyncio and the async/await syntax are both part of Python, I think
> that we should extend TestCase to support it. The simplest solution
On Oct 10, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 10.10.18 20:19, Yury Selivanov пише:
> > Thanks for proposing this. Yes, it makes sense to have
> > unittest.AsyncTestCase in 3.8. AFAIK Lisa Roach (copied) was working
> > on that (as well as on async Mock object), but I'm not sure what's
10.10.18 20:19, Yury Selivanov пише:
Thanks for proposing this. Yes, it makes sense to have
unittest.AsyncTestCase in 3.8. AFAIK Lisa Roach (copied) was working
on that (as well as on async Mock object), but I'm not sure what's the
status of her work. I suggest to search for an open issue for
Thanks for proposing this. Yes, it makes sense to have
unittest.AsyncTestCase in 3.8. AFAIK Lisa Roach (copied) was working
on that (as well as on async Mock object), but I'm not sure what's the
status of her work. I suggest to search for an open issue for this on
bugs.python.org; if there's
Hi everyone and good morning to some of you,
Since asyncio and the async/await syntax are both part of Python, I think
that we should extend TestCase to support it. The simplest solution that
I can think of is to create unittest.AsyncTestCase sub-class with the
following extensions:
- create a
