>
> Potentially, but one of the big challenges you'll face is to establish
> how it differs from using asyncio in the current process to manage
> tasks dispatched to other processes via run_in_executor, and when
> specifically it would be useful thing for a developer to have in the
> builtin toolki
On 29.08.2016 05:32, Nick Coghlan wrote:
(Alternatively, if the answer the interviewer is looking for is "I
wouldn't, I would use...", then it may be an unfair "Gotcha!"
question, and those aren't cool either, since they expect the
interviewee to be able to read the interviewer's mind, rather tha
On 29 August 2016 at 15:53, Thales filizola costa wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> I have just checked all the links you posted, they are indeed very
> interesting and very efficient. However, I think those are very complicate
> in terms of installation and setup, and I still see a lot of usages for a
> mult
Hi Nick,
I have just checked all the links you posted, they are indeed very
interesting and very efficient. However, I think those are very complicate
in terms of installation and setup, and I still see a lot of usages for a
multi-process scheduler.
2016-08-28 20:32 GMT-07:00 Nick Coghlan :
> O
On 29 August 2016 at 11:50, Thales filizola costa wrote:
> What do you guys think? How to improve it? Is it relevant enough to be
> incorporated to std python ?
There are actually quite a few distributed schedulers out there (which
can expand beyond a single machine), but "python multiprocess
sch
On 2016-08-29 02:50, Thales filizola costa wrote:
Hey guys,
I was recently involved in a job change, and for that I have been doing
a lot of programming interviews (white board questions). One common
question on those interviews were: "how to implement a scheduler?"
follow up by "how to make it
