On 11 October 2016 at 10:43, Václav Dvořák wrote:
> But I find this misleading, as the original KeyError is not really an error
> at all. I could of course avoid the situation by changing the try/except
> (EAFP) into a test for the key's presence (LBYL) but that's not very
> Pythonic and less thre
On 2016-10-11 01:43, Václav Dvořák wrote:
I'm aware of "raise ... from None" (from PEP 415). However, how can I
achieve that same effect (of suppressing the "During handling of the
above exception, another exception occurred" message) without having
control over the code that is executed from the
