Nathaniel Smith píše v St 06. 03. 2019 v 19:21 -0800:
> You probably want to file a bug on the setuptools tracker:
> https://github.com/pypa/setuptools
>
> It's maintained by different people than Python itself, and is
> responsible for defining 'setup.py test'.
I think we have to bugs (or defici
06.03.19 22:12, Matěj Cepl пише:
I am a lead maintainer of Python packages in OpenSUSE and I can
see the pattern of many packagers adding blindly
python setup.py test
to %check section of our SPEC file. The problem is that if the
package doesn't use unittest (it actually uses nose, pytest
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:13 PM Matěj Cepl wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am a lead maintainer of Python packages in OpenSUSE and I can
> see the pattern of many packagers adding blindly
>
> python setup.py test
>
> to %check section of our SPEC file. The problem is that if the
> package doesn't use uni
On 3/6/2019 3:12 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Hi,
I am a lead maintainer of Python packages in OpenSUSE and I can
see the pattern of many packagers adding blindly
python setup.py test
to %check section of our SPEC file.
I am not familiar with setup.py, so I don't know how this affects the
pre
I would just file a bug and add a PR.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 12:14 PM Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a lead maintainer of Python packages in OpenSUSE and I can
> see the pattern of many packagers adding blindly
>
> python setup.py test
>
> to %check section of our SPEC file. The problem is
On 2019-03-06 20:12, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Hi,
I am a lead maintainer of Python packages in OpenSUSE and I can
see the pattern of many packagers adding blindly
python setup.py test
to %check section of our SPEC file. The problem is that if the
package doesn't use unittest (it actually uses no
