On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 17:36, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Erik Bray wrote:
> > Then following my own logic it
> > would be desirable to also allow the nested for loop syntax of list
> > comprehensions outside them as well.
>
> The only use for such a syntax would be to put
> an inadvisable amount of stu
>
> for x in seq1 if p1(x)\
> for y in seq2 if p2(y)\
> for z in seq3 if p3(z):
> result.append(f(x, y, z))
>
It think it is not uncommon to have nested loops, maybe with an if/continue
statement at the beginning, with only one logical block that then should go
down only one indentation level
On 1 October 2016 at 10:25, Alexander Heger wrote:
> I think wasting of indentation levels for a single logical block should be
> avoided if possible to make the code more legible, otherwise one hits the
> suggested line length limit too fast - suppose this is now inside a method,
> you already lo
