On 13 November 2016 at 04:07, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, David Mertz wrote:
>
>> If we *do* want the name 'slice' as the spelling for the thing that can
>> either be called or indexed to create a slice object, we could probably use
>> some boilerplate like this:
Sounds good.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi
wrote:
> On 13 November 2016 at 04:07, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 5:46 PM, David Mertz wrote:
>>
>>> If we *do* want the name 'slice' as the spelling for the thing that can
>>> either be called or indexe
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Alexander Heger wrote:
>
> But let's make str() of a slice more suggestive of actual slicing, and
>> as a bonus, make slices easier to create too.
>>
>> str(slice(None, None, None)) => "slice[:]"
>>
>
> following all the later discussion, I'd like to come back
On 12 November 2016 at 21:08, João Matos wrote:
> What I would like to propose is the creation of the reverse:
> a =+ c is the same as a = c + a
> a =- c is the same as a = c - a
> a =* c is the same as a = c * a
> a =/ c is the same as a = c / a
> a =// c is the same as a = c // a
> a =% c is th
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Mikhail V wrote:
> On 12 November 2016 at 21:08, João Matos wrote:
>
> > What I would like to propose is the creation of the reverse:
> > a =+ c is the same as a = c + a
> > a =- c is the same as a = c - a
> > a =* c is the same as a = c * a
> > a =/ c is the sam
On 14 November 2016 at 00:08, Todd wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Mikhail V wrote:
>>
>> On 12 November 2016 at 21:08, João Matos wrote:
>>
>> > What I would like to propose is the creation of the reverse:
>> > a =+ c is the same as a = c + a
>> > a =- c is the same as a = c - a
>>
2016-11-06 23:27 GMT-02:00 Wes Turner :
> - So, IIUC, for recursive list comprehensions
> - "prev" = x_(n-1)
> - there is a need to define an initial value
> - chain([1000], [...])
> - sometimes, we actually need window function
> - __[0] = x_(n-1)
> - __[1] = x_(n-2) # this
>
I think I understand now.
Still, for the more general case, I think it could be useful to be able to
specify a max window size for the the dequeue (or indexable list-like
structure);
though defaulting to None and storing all values may be additionally
useful.
On Monday, November 14, 2016, Danilo J
