Re: [Python-ideas] New PyThread_tss_ C-API for CPython

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > That all sounds good--between the two option 2 looks a bit more explicit. > > Though what about this? Rather than adding another type, the original > proposal could be changed slightly so that Py_tss_t *is* partially >

Re: [Python-ideas] New PyThread_tss_ C-API for CPython

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 21 December 2016 at 01:35, Masayuki YAMAMOTO > wrote: >> >> 2016-12-20 22:30 GMT+09:00 Erik Bray : >>> >>> This is probably an implementation detail, but ISTM that even

Re: [Python-ideas] New PyThread_tss_ C-API for CPython

On 21 December 2016 at 20:01, Erik Bray wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Option 2: Similar to option 1, but using a custom type alias, rather than > > using a C99 bool directly > > > > The closest API we have to these