I could emulate the "where" semantics as described by Steven using the
class statement and eval :
I guess it is useful if someone want to try refactoring a piece of "real
world" code, and see
if it really feels better - then we could try to push for the "where"
syntax, which I kinda like:
(This
Brice PARENT writes:
> Examples:
>
> with b = a + 1:
> y = b + 2
I don't think that could work, because the with "arguments" should be
expressions, not statements. However, IIRC someone already suggested the
alternative
with a+1 as b:
y = b + 2
but that clashes with the ordinary "conte
