A generator can be a good idea, however, I wonder if it's really readable to
have a `f_samples`.
And the structure is the same as in
[y + g(y) for y in [f(x) for x in range(10)]]
if you replace the list with a generator. And it's similar for other solutions
you mentioned.
Well, I know that it can
Thank you Paul, what you said is enlightening and I agree on most part of it.
I'll propose two candidate syntaxs.
1. `with ... as ...`
This syntax is more paralles as there would be `for` and `with` clause as
well as `for` and `with` statement. However, the existing `with` statement is
seman
You are right and actually I sometimes did the same thing in a temporary script
such as in ipython.
Because in my opinion, it's not really elegant code as one may be puzzled for
the list `[f(x)]`.
Well, although that's quite subjective.
And also I test the code and find another `for` clause can
Hi Steve, Thank you for so detailed comments.
My comments also below interleaved with yours.
At 2018-02-16 08:57:40, "Steven D'Aprano" wrote:
>Hi fhsxfhsx, and welcome.
>
>My comments below, interleaved with yours.
>
>
>On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 01:56:44PM +0800, fhsxfhsx wrote:
>
>[quoted out
