On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Currently, the documentation (as well as plenty of other places on the
> Internet, such as Stack Overflow answers) mentions msgfmt.py and
> pygettext.py.
>
> See https://docs.python.org/3/library/gettext.html
>
>> (Python also includes pure-Py
On 28/07/18 21:07, Abe Dillon wrote:
[>> = Me]
We could argue about how intuitive or not these operators are, but they
are used in other languages, so they clearly aren't completely unintuitive.
Other languages are other languages. Other languages use the " ?
: " form of the the ternary operat
On 29/07/18 16:12, Abe Dillon wrote:
spam?.eggs.cheese.aardvark # why would you ever do this?
If you knew that if you really have something in "spam", your program
guarantees it will have an "eggs" attribute with a "cheese" attribute,
etc, you just don't know if "spam" is not None. It's the
Hi all,
Not sure if this subject has been brought up already, but why can't we
redefine methods as such for example:
c = MyClass
o = c()
def c.foo(cls): ...
def o.bar(self): ...
Thanks in advance for sharing some of your insight
--
∞
___
Python-idea
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > It might be:
> >
> > $ python3 -m gettext
>
> +1
>
> > And:
> >
> > $ python3 -m gettext.msgfmt
>
> +1
> Note that this means gettext will need to become a package.
>
> > And (p
Hi Jamesie
Thank you for your question. You asked why not
> c = MyClass
> o = c()
>
> def c.foo(cls): ...
> def o.bar(self): ...
I've the same same query, but never had the courage to ask. So that
you for asking. And also giving me a chance to share my thoughts.
In Ruby, I believe, you can 'open
On 31 July 2018 at 01:35, Jonathan Fine wrote:
> Hi Jamesie
>
> Thank you for your question. You asked why not
>> c = MyClass
>> o = c()
>>
>> def c.foo(cls): ...
>> def o.bar(self): ...
>
> I've the same same query, but never had the courage to ask. So that
> you for asking. And also giving me a
Shortcuts designed for CLI are just to "be more mnemonic" have to be considered
with caution.
If gettext is a package, it means the whole python community shoud agree on
that.
msgfmt is part of gettext, so yes, python -m gettest.msgfmt is the best long
lasting command. Or it could be 'python -m
Shortcuts designed for CLI are just to "be more mnemonic" have to be considered
with caution.
If gettext is a package, it means the whole python community shoud agree on
that.
msgfmt is part of gettext, so yes, python -m gettest.msgfmt is the best long
lasting command. Or it could be 'python -m
[Rhodri James]
> We could argue about how intuitive or not these operators are, but they
>>> are used in other languages, so they clearly aren't completely
>>> unintuitive.
>>>
>>
>> Other languages are other languages. Other languages use the "
>> ?
>> : " form of the the ternary operator. That
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
If you need to replace them for some reason, it will preferably be
> within a temporary bounded scope, using a tool like
> unittest.mock.patch, rather than as a permanent change that affects
> every other use of the class within the process.
Hello,
Do you think it would be nice to allow with statements inside genexps or
list comprehensions? The functions __enter__ and __exit__ would be
automatically called as iterables are traversed. I am thinking of
drafting a PEP about this. Examples:
This
g = (f.read() for fn in file
I think C# calls methods that are added to a class "extension methods".
You can make a decorator that will do that for you:
> def extend(cls):
> """
> DECORATOR TO ADD METHODS TO CLASSES
> :param cls: THE CLASS TO ADD THE METHOD TO
> :return:
> """
> def extender(func):
>
Rudy,
I think your proposal may be very specific to iterable context managers;
in which case, make a method that makes that assumption:
> def iter_with(obj):
> with obj as context:
> yield from context
and use it
> g = (
> f.read()
> for fn in filenames
> for f in iter_w
On 30 July 2018 at 20:15, Rudy Matela wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Rudy,
> Do you think it would be nice to allow with statements inside genexps or
> list comprehensions? The functions __enter__ and __exit__ would be
> automatically called as iterables are traversed. I am thinking of
> drafting a PEP ab
Jamesie Pic wrote:
def o.bar(self): ...
You could get almost the same effect with
from functools import partial
def bar(self, other_args):
...
o.bar = partial(bar, o)
But IMO this is nowhere near being a common enough thing to
do to justify having special syntax for it.
--
G
On 7/30/2018 9:43 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
$ python3 -m gettext.msgfmt
+1
Note that this means gettext will need to become a package.
Once there is a command line interface, arguments can be supplied to the
module, as in python -m g
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:10:32AM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Jamesie Pic wrote:
> >def o.bar(self): ...
>
> You could get almost the same effect with
>
>from functools import partial
>
>def bar(self, other_args):
> ...
>
>o.bar = partial(bar, o)
Why are you using functools.p
Here is an example of how it could be done.
https://gist.github.com/stephanh42/97b47506e5e416f97f5790c070be7878
Stephan
Op di 31 jul. 2018 01:29 schreef Steven D'Aprano :
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:10:32AM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > Jamesie Pic wrote:
> > >def o.bar(self): ...
> >
> > You
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 9:44 AM Jonathan Fine wrote:
> By all means start a PEP (on github) if you find it helps you. I think
> it's too early.
>
> If this problem has a pure Python solution, then I think it best to
> develop it as a third party module. I suggest the name slicetools.
> When slice
20 matches
Mail list logo
