Hi Nick,
On 3/12/19 3:57 PM, Nick Timkovich wrote:
> The onus is on you
> to positively demonstrate you require both directions, not him to
> negatively demonstrate it's never required.
>From Calvin I just wanted to have some examples where he sees a use for
swapping operands (nothing to be demons
On 3/15/19 9:02 PM, francismb wrote:
> And the operator is the function.exactly, function application/call
___
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/c
On 3/15/19 11:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Python 3.5 introduced the modulo operator for bytes objects. How are
> you going to write a function that determines whether or not a piece
> of code depends on this?
I'm not sure I understand the question. Isn't *a piece of code* that
does a modulo oper
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 1:09 AM francismb wrote:
>
> On 3/15/19 11:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Python 3.5 introduced the modulo operator for bytes objects. How are
> > you going to write a function that determines whether or not a piece
> > of code depends on this?
> I'm not sure I understand
On 3/15/19 11:09 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> And, are you going to run this function on every single code snippet
> before you try it?
If just trying, may be not. But yes, if I care to know where the
applicability limits are (interpreter versions) before integrating it.
IMHO I don't think it's a g
I am in desperate need of a dict similar structure that allows sets and/or
dicts as keys *and* values. My application is NLP conceptual plagiarism
detection. Dealing with infinite grammars communicating illogical
concepts. Would be even better if keys could nest the same data structure,
e.g. set(s)
francismb writes:
> On 3/15/19 4:54 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > What 2to3 does is to handle a lot of automatic conversions, such as
> > flipping the identifiers from str to bytes and unicode to str. It was
> > necessary to have some such tool because of the very large amount of
> > suc
This is an interesting challenge you have. However, this list is for
proposing ideas for changes in the Python language itself, in particular
the CPython reference implementation.
Python-list or some discussion site dealing with machine learning or
natural language processing would be appropriate
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 01:13:29AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
[...]
> Yes, it will. Can you determine whether some code does this? Can you
> recognize what kind of object is on the left of a percent sign?
> Remember, it quite possibly won't be a literal.
I don't understand whether your question
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 9:34 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 01:13:29AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...]
> > Yes, it will. Can you determine whether some code does this? Can you
> > recognize what kind of object is on the left of a percent sign?
> > Remember, it quite pos
And in case it wasn't clear, "python-list" is here:
python-l...@python.org
Please try posting the same question there instead.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson
On 17Mar2019 16:23, David Mertz wrote:
This is an interesting challenge you have. However, this list is for
proposing ideas for changes in
11 matches
Mail list logo