> On Oct 4, 2018, at 6:24 PM, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [Tim]
>>
>> > Note that transforming
>> >
>> > {EXPR!d:FMT}
>> >
>> > into
>> >
>> > EXPR={repr(EXPR):FMT}
>> >
>> > is actually slightly more involved than transforming it into
>> >
>> > EXPR={EXPR:FMT}
>> >
>> > so I don't
I just joined the ideas list today so I do not know if this has been
discussed.
Using dataclasses has been great for me, but a challenge is what to do when
you don't *know* if the object you are using is a dataclass, and could be a
variety of other classes.
This could easily occur when you don't
On 03/05/2019 17:37, Ricky Teachey wrote:
I just joined the ideas list today so I do not know if this has been
discussed.
Using dataclasses has been great for me, but a challenge is what to do when
you don't *know* if the object you are using is a dataclass, and could be a
variety of other class
And what about recursive structures?
I do think this is a rabbit hole worth getting into as I've written an iffy
dict serializer (and differ) for an audit system at work. There are many uses
for such a thing I think. But maybe we just need some informal protocol?
> On 3 May 2019, at 19:00, Rho
