I think that we're more or less in broad agreement, but I wanted to
comment on this:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 09:41:00PM -0700, Andrew Barnert wrote:
> Yes, that’s the whole point of the message you were responding to:
> extended grapheme clusters are the Unicode approximation of
> characters;
Hello everyone,
I hope that E-Mail reaches someone. Since its the first time I am using
a thing like a mailing list, I am saying sorry in advance for any
inconvience caused ;-)
However, I am writing you because of a small idea / feature request for
the python import mechanism, which caused me
Hi Richard, and welcome!
My comments are below, interspersed with your comments, which are
prefixed with ">".
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Richard Vogel wrote:
[...]
> Current state:
>
> * Python will search for the first TOP-LEVEL hit when resolving an
>import statement and
On Oct 28, 2019, at 04:44, Richard Vogel wrote:
>
> Current state:
> Python will search for the first TOP-LEVEL hit when resolving an import
> statement and search inside there for the remainder part of the import. If it
> cannot find the symbols it will fail. (Tested on Python 3.8)
> Proposed
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 6:58 AM Soni L. wrote:
> foo.setParseAction(lambda a, b, c: raise FuckPython(":(")) is invalid
> syntax, which makes pyparsing useless.
>
Insulting the project that you're trying to get help with is unnecessary to
get your point across.
Consider this a warning that such
On Oct 27, 2019, at 17:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> and the fact that
> throw() isn't in everyone's toolkits already suggests that this really
> isn't a major problem to be solved.
Searching on “python raise expression”, the first hit is a StackOverflow
question where the asker is looking for
Steve Jorgensen wrote:
> I repeatedly make proposals without examples. Sorry about that, and I'm going
> to stop
> doing that.
> Upon trying to compose an example, I realize that what I'm asking for is not
> actually
> the best pattern for what I'd like to see, so when I have composed a better
>
28.10.19 20:38, Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas пише:
Many of them are abusing throw(StopIteration) to fake a “takewhile clause” in
comprehensions
Well, so actually you needed the break expression. Or multistatement
comprehension.
___
Python-ideas
On Oct 28, 2019, at 14:23, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> 28.10.19 20:38, Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas пише:
>> Many of them are abusing throw(StopIteration) to fake a “takewhile clause”
>> in comprehensions
>
> Well, so actually you needed the break expression. Or multistatement
> comprehensi
